Financial position: Based on the fiscal report in 2009 Johnson & Jonson total net income is $12B, so this is an indicator that the fiscal position for Johnson & Johnson is very goodish and thats why we ingest it a high rate. For proctor & Gamble the total net income is most $11B and its less than J&J, alike for Novartis total income is $8B so we bowl over them same rate. Advertising: P&R have the highest outgo on advertising with $4.18B according to Ad Age, and past J&J comes next with $2.1B, and the Novartis is the lowest company that spent on advertising. R&D: Include the number of product innovations the direct brings to commercialize, the more the company spent on R&D the more it will produced products first, hence steal the more trade share. Novartis is highest company that pays for R&D in 2009 with $7.5B, J&J spent $7B its not that different between both companies, therefore P&G follow them and spent $3.2B.
Management: We didnt have a go at it any differences to say that one company is better than the opposer in the field of management, but in general on the whole these three companies have a very good answer management staff and thats why we gave them a same rate. intersection quality: The physical integrity of products created by the firm, Since each(prenominal) these companies scud away with sensitive product that touches people life, they should ensure that they equip all the requirements, so all pharmaceutical companies have almost exchangeable standards to know if the quality of products have met or not.If you fatality to line a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper