Prison and National Probation Service cooperation Essay

prison house and National Probation Service cooperation - Essay ExampleWhile some perceived of it as a rehabilitative step toward the reduction of reoffending rates and a positive contribution towards the greater national aim of detestation reduction, others critiqued it as a misinformed strategy which would confuse the boundaries between prison and community. Such confusion, as critics maintain, will have shocking social consequences insofar as it is predicated on the assumption that inmate and out-mate offender management subscribe to the same(p) concern, principles, aims and, thus, paradigms (Valios, 2004 Palmer, 2003 Peters, LeVasseur and Chandler, 2004).Proceeding from the background and controversy outlined in the above, the dissertation shall focus on the aims of the proposed evaluator frame reform, critically analysing Noms from the perspective of best practices managerial theories. The rationale for selection did not simply emanate from the coeval nature of the issue, or solely from its societal value but because the researcher has been professionally involved in both prison and probation services for a number of years and is, consequently, in a position to analyse Noms and argue the exigencies of its implementation on the basis of experiential evidence. Apart from the experiential knowledge and both inseparable and professional interest in the issue, the topic was further selected consequent to the fact that the researchers professional background places him in a position whereby he can collect primary data, conduct the requisite surveys and administer the requisite questionnaires with comparative ease. In other words, the researchers professional background and aw areness of the fact that community safety and societal interests are best served through the articulation and implementation of an effective and...As earlier stated, the primary areas of concern are the National Offender Management Service and organisational and people management theory. As pertains to either of these two issues, the live wealth of academic literature testifies to their respective values and the extent to which the latter may be constructively informed by the former.Over the past two decades, offender management literature has articulated the imperatives of utilising quick people and organisational management tools and strategies in order to attain the managerial efficiency and effectiveness level upon which the goals of the justice system are predicated. The justice system, operating according to the principles of offender exclusion and rehabilitation within a prison system, followed by the release of offenders into society and under the supervisory guidance of the probation service, has been largely incapable of welcome the justice systems expressed goal of reducing overall offence rates and eliminating reoffending. The glum inability to satisfy the articulated goals exposes what some have identified as a fundamentally flaw people and organisational management paradigm. According to the aforementioned perspective, the failure of the justice system to either reduce aversion rates or rehabilitate offenders, thereby offsetting reoffense potentialities, is indicative of the greater failure to embrace effective and expeditious people and organisational management paradigms.